Saturday, 13 June 2015

High Technology and Human Development

Some fundamental assumptions - often fashioned by leaders and supported by the - exercise the collective conscience of the. The development is generally superior but not always civilized. The assumptions in question are of this kind: "Our degree of technological progress is second to none. Upon reaching this amount, we additionally need to prepare our society for peace, and to ensure the peace, technology has to be revised to cultivate the policy of war." Technological progress that's pushed in this way establishes for some other societies that worry a danger to their individual sovereignties. They're shoved to also cultivate a war technology.

In the realm of culture, this style of development isn't praiseworthy, nor is it justifiable. As it's not justifiable, it's not socially responsible. An inspection of the assumptions will show it is the last one that presents a difficulty. The final assumption is the decision of two previous assumptions but isn't in any manner rationally deduced. What it reveals being thus, and is a passionately deduced judgment, it neglects to be reckoned at the time at as a judgment from a prepared head.

A society that progress in accordance with the presuppositions that are aforementioned - and particularly according to the illogical decision - has transmitted the head of non-negotiable superiority to its individuals. The power of fire dictates the rate of human actions. Whether in willed partnerships or constructive engagements, the rule of equality neglects to function just due to the superiority syndrome that fascinates the leader as well as the led. And another society that will not share in fire of such society or the collective sensibilities has, by the reasoning that is estimated, become a potential or real adversary and faces confrontation on all possible fronts.

Most of that which we learn about the current universe, via the media, needless to say, is controlled by state of the art technology. Societies which have the most of such technology are again, time and additionally, promised to be the most complex. It's not their progress that lifts them to the pinnacle of superiority, power, and recognition. They are able to additionally use technology to simplify and move a comprehension of nature and life in another way, a direction that will remove, as much as really possible, a previous link between nature and life that was, in several regards, dangerous and mysterious. This last point will not absolutely mean that technological progress is a mark of a superior culture.

That which we should understand is the fact that technology and culture aren't terms that are conjugal. Civilized individuals might have an innovative technology or they might not have it. Culture is not only a question of technology and science or technical infrastructure, or, again, the marvel of buildings; it also has to do with the mental and moral reflexes of individuals along with their level of social connectedness in their particular society and beyond. It's from the typical conduct make-up of individuals that all types of physical structures may be produced, so too the issue of technology and science. Therefore, the type of bridges, roads, buildings, heavy machines, amongst others, that we can see in a society could tell, the behavioural pattern of the individuals, usually. Behavioural routine may also tell a lot about the extent to which the natural ecosystem was used for technology, science and infrastructural tasks. Above all, behavioural routine could tell a lot about comprehension and the perceptions of the folks about others.

I do believe - and, I presume, most folks do consider - that upon hastening the speed of technology as well as infrastructural tasks, the environment has to recede in its naturalness. After progressing technology (and its attendant structures or thoughts) competes with all the green surroundings for space, this environment that houses trees, grass, flowers, a variety of critters and fish has to shrink in size. Yet the increase of people, the constant person craving for quality life, the necessity to command life without depending on the unpredictable state of the natural surroundings prompt using technology. Technology do not need to pose unwarranted danger to the natural surroundings. It's the abuse of technology that's in question. While a society may justly use technology to boost quality of life, its individuals also need to ask: "how much technology do we have to safeguard the natural environment?" As a way to counter the dangerous destruction of the latter, imagine society Y combines the reasonable usage of technology together with the natural surroundings, then this type of placement prompts the purpose that society Y is a fan of the principle of equilibrium. From this principle, you can boldly reason that society Y favours equilibrium more than madness, and has, thus, the awareness of societal and ethical obligation. Any state of the art technology points to the sophistication of the human head, also it suggests the natural ecosystem has been tamed.

1 comment:

  1. Due to the advanced technology, people can take the benefit of utilizing the new technology based materials. The credit goes to the Data Marketing Consultancy for their innovative ideas of transferring the messages to the people via consumer mailing data lists

    ReplyDelete